MEHWISH MUGHAL versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT
Article 154 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Termination of FIR in the High Court's Constitutional Jurisdiction The FIA (petitioner) filed a complaint alleging that the complainant filed an FIR in response to the filing of the accused. The lawsuit was filed against her husband for termination and recovery of dowry. Subsequently, the husband's family filed three FIs against the family members of his wife, two of which were canceled by the FI. I was seized, while one was cheated, in which case the wife's father, who appeared to be 70 years old, was accused. As it was shown that the prosecution could not identify any evidence / material collected against the wife's father even if the allegations contained in the three FIs were admitted, no one against his family The crime was not proven. The husband's wife Mala and his family members, who filed the FI, were clearly floating on the record, since the wife had filed the FI after her husband filed the case and his In the present case, interference of the High Court in the present case would be unlawful and upholding the high court, and the court also abused the court proceedings. To prevent The constitutional application was allowed to prevent the proceedings of the present case, and on the basis of which the FI Rupees and pending proceedings were canceled. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
