ABDUL LATEEF BROHI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
The CRPC was charged with not providing abusive evidence in the statement under Section 9 (a) (vi) and 32 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), suspension of section 426 and 342 powers under suspension section 342. He was convicted by the trial court. The accused, who had committed the crime of corruption and corruption, had presented evidence that he had not been convicted by the trial court during his statement under Section 342, CR effect. This evidence cannot be used against him, in the appeal, to see whether the court's decision was a factual or apparent error of fact or law that was raised by the accused, suspended without restriction. was done. In the circumstances, the High Court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
