Section 302 (b) Conan Shaheedat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120 Katie Ahmed, the prosecution of praise for the evidence Case Onus was convicted by a trial court for the murder of a 7-year-old girl and his He was sentenced to prison. Life prosecution alleges that the accused had joined her at the date, time and place of the incident. He was alone with her when the incident happened. And the witnesses found it with them, not only denied, but also the facts / allegations were admitted to the trial court Burden to prove those facts / allegations were in the prosecution and the same stand proved that the complainant and others There was no contradiction in the evidence of. Witnesses, as they have all testified that when they arrived at the scene after hearing the moan of the deceased girl, they found the accused with both hands wrapped around his neck and sitting on the deceased's chest. And he was choking him, which was enough and irregular, before the trial court that there was trivial and medical evidence against the accused that proved him guilty of murdering a minor girl and any suspicion against him. As it turned out, the trial was an appropriate definition of the evidence based on the trial court's reasoning and the correct and record evidence. Interfering with the trial court's decision because the court had already eased the date for the date of the sentence, h the accused's appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
