NOOR MUHAMMAD versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Writing a job absence went on a three-month leave and did not resume duty when the applicant terminated his services. The ignorant requested that he be told about the suspension order and that he learned about it only when he later came to join the duty record which revealed that he had a permanent Notices were sent to the address and he did not receive a non-refundable return due to which his leave was not approved which led to his being alone. Was enough to deny relief from. Constitutional jurisdiction overturned, applicant failed to file interference with constitutional jurisdiction, petitions dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kohistan lawyer