GHULAM MURTAZA SHAH versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 439 of the Police Act (V of 1868), Section 32 applicants violated the provisional license terms, withdrew the Tiziya procession. Listened to their ignorance. In reviewing the court's orders below, applicants who had no knowledge of the specific state of the license, contradicted their previous position before the trial court, reviewing whether the High Court had any substance with the High Court. Would not be, however, in view of the tolerance demanded by Islam, rejecting this amendment. , Only token fines were imposed on applicants
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Patika lawyer
