Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD KAYANI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Talent and Forfeiture) Rules 1977 Rr 5, 6 & 7 Compulsory Retirement Appellant was convicted of misappropriation and misappropriation of public funds against the appellant without interruption by the authorized officer. An independent inquiry was held. , Ocular as well as the documentary film, were available to connect the appellant with the Counterfeit and Defection Commission, which is sufficient to provide strong evidence in support of the allegations that the appellant supported this argument. Nothing to show that the appellant was biased in any way. After the prosecution, the appellant is not found guilty of any defect but is also heard at the stage of the inquiry, he was given the opportunity to be heard in connection with the showcase notice and to be investigated. Almost every item of the accusations was put to him. And the explanation was also recorded on the melee, the allegations proved in the testament to the fact that there was no prior and no mitigating circumstances, there was no guarantee of interference with the applicant's mandatory retirement. best advocate from Nooriabad lawyer