Find a Lawyer

SAEED-UZ-ZAFAR GILLANI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 5 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act (XXII of 1975), Lane Termination of Secretary 4 Appellant, was promoted as Assistant in Civil Secretariat and the Superintendent of Armed Services Board Office against the former cadre. Has been posted to. About the post appellant asserted that his entitlement to the Civil Secretariat was intact but was later terminated under an incomplete order for no reason. That he had not exercised his option in connection with his development and posting to the Armed Services Board office and that he was on deputation to the office was a fact that the appellant was better positioned as a superintendent than he was. I get paid on a larger scale than that. The original position, as an assistant, was enough to deny and negate his version of himself that he had chosen not to join his new assignment or was not a volunteer party for his promotion. , Although the position of Assistant in the Secretariat was permanently grounds, but in the absence of an order in respect of the Assistant retaining his entitlement against his original position, it cannot be admitted that his entitlement was kept in the Secretariat, The right to change his parent's department was not available to the public servant. Unless it was specifically recorded for transfer, the appellant was never sent to the depot to serve on the Armed Services Board, but was kept against the police on a regular basis. Does not have the right to change the original post record on a regular basis ask a advocate free from Tall lawyer