Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Sections 222, 7 307, 3 323, 2 evidence2, reation8 and ?99 evidence were found suspicious of the presence of two eyewitnesses at the time of the incident and their evidence was carefully omitted at the relevant time. The witness's presence was established, which was a natural witness and suffered serious injuries. He could not deny the witness's statement regarding the two suspects who fired at him and his son. Attendance goes beyond any doubt, none of which has ever filed an appeal. Supreme Court conviction and sentence of the accused found guilty under Section 2302, 7 307/34 & 45 45 Supreme Court, other counts pursuant to PPC, 30 307, PPC and conviction under Section 148 The PPC was not proven, however.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.