GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Sections 222, 7 307, 3 323, 2 evidence2, reation8 and ?99 evidence were found suspicious of the presence of two eyewitnesses at the time of the incident and their evidence was carefully omitted at the relevant time. The witness's presence was established, which was a natural witness and suffered serious injuries. He could not deny the witness's statement regarding the two suspects who fired at him and his son. Attendance goes beyond any doubt, none of which has ever filed an appeal. Supreme Court conviction and sentence of the accused found guilty under Section 2302, 7 307/34 & 45 45 Supreme Court, other counts pursuant to PPC, 30 307, PPC and conviction under Section 148 The PPC was not proven, however.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Jampur lawyer
