ABDUL RAHIIN SHAH versus STATE
Section 2302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), according to the applicants, allow the contention of the witnesses to the contradiction in the evidence, the lower courts did not have the material properly related to the same FIR Was dealt with. A preliminary investigation, even if true, would not in any way react to the evidence of witnesses who had no animosity or intent to falsely implicate the accused in the capital charge, Based on the deceased's brother, a recovery witness, the High Court correctly said that it was admitted from other credible evidence that two days after the incident, blood-stained clothing was recovered. Determination of lower court offenses for lack of motivation on grounds of criminal instability and lack of credible evidence. Didn't get enough. A substantial amount of the defendant's ocular testimony was found to be mutual, the defendant's conviction was well established and did not deserve interference. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Hala lawyer