SIRAJUDDIN versus STATE
Section 2302 Constitutionton of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in the day of the leave of appeal, there was no reason for the false witness to be involved in the daylight, and the non-interest-bearing witnesses were found guilty and their evidence was non-existent. He was disposed of, as the prosecution has alleged. It was supported by documentary evidence, but even if it was found to be insufficient to respond to other evidence in any way that was sufficient to maintain the conviction of the accused, which also proved to be credible. The declaration of the death of the deceased in the THIR FIR was also found to be true depending on the accused being convicted, good grounds were laid, leave application for appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer
