KHIZAR MAHMOOD QURESHI versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT
Section 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act, 1975, Section 4 [Amendment of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals (Amendment Ordinance, 1988]) Appeal Limitations Appeals filed against the invalid order of promotion filed in 1981 96 were passed in 1981. As the provision of the law stood in 1981, that is, Section 4 of the Tribunals Act, ruled by the government that after the amendment of section 4 (1) (a) of AJ, Also, no departmental treatment was available to the bereaved government employee through representation and was read under section 21 of the Civil Servants Act 1976, under the Kashmir Service Tribunals Act, 1975 However, under Section 21 (2), promotion of procurement through representation was not available but at the same time there was no such constraint on priority. Appeal or application for review under sub-section (1) ( 1) The appellant preferred the applications after waiting for the appellants 2 7 1981 and 6 7 1981 respectively for the review against the cash order in the date of 9, 1981, the ninth day of the termination of the treatment, the service tribunal. Prior appeal within the next thirty days on 8 8 8 10 1981 and 26 10 1981, both appeals before the Tribunal were, therefore, within a reasonable period of time, so the delivery service of section 4 (1) (a) The Tubes Act, 1975 (as amended) was introduced in 1981 in relation to priority appeals
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
