Find a Lawyer

SADIQ HUSSAIN QURESHI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

On the expulsion of Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, the Applicants of the Head Dispensers in the Health Department of the Health Department joined the new station and proceeded on leave and did not return and consequently they were given the Appellant. To no avail Prior to the appropriate authority, the Department of Treatment, ie, Director, Health Services / Secretary, Department of Health, who was appointed by the Authority but submitted his representation to the District Health Officer, so that the Appellant was thirty days from the date of the order sanctioned by the appropriate day. The tribunal had not received a clean hand during the period. The order of dismissal of the Department of Authority shows that it has neither been approved as a result of the inquiry nor was there any show cause notice issued to the appellant and hence it was a invalid order as a result of its decision. Regardless of every invalid order cannot be deleted. Considering the merit and other aspects of the case that are materially linked to appellant A's deficiencies, after fourteen years, he sought relief and was presented with difficulty, his conduct and knowledge of his You did not qualify for assistance, as he had missed the on-court treatment available before going to the tribunal. Therefore, no relief was entitled to the law, it did not help the watchman, nor did any appellant leave his job at the service of his choice and after he had been out of the department for a long time, he had lost all necessary qualifications. Could not be brought back to his office. Necessary to perform its official duties lawer from fb area from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer