MUHAMMAD SIDIQUE KHAN versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 Section 4 Civil Service Seniority Appellant, Head Constable, Assistant Sub Inspector challenging the development of the respondents who have a good record of seniority, educational qualification and services as junior positions. I presented. Consideration was given to development but competent respondents / developers were preferred, as no employee can claim to be promoted from one position to another. If it cannot do so under the provisions of the clause or the service, then only the promotion authority can determine suit for the development of an employee after examining all relevant considerations such as seniority, competence, ability and previous government record. Because none of them was less important than the other for the purity and efficiency of public service. . SR (B) Service Tribunals Act, 1975, the authority of the department determining fitness against an order or decision or the appointment or appointment of a person to another position, or advanced to [civil service].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
