Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus STATE


Section 497 (2) Property Against Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 guarantees that the material available on record against the applicants contains only statements made by the accused during their interrogation. Was presented to Participation in the robbery commission which showed that the accused were not sufficient to link the applicants with crime, no recovery was brought in from the accused applicants who were not put in any kind of identification parade case against the accused applicant. Was gone, so more investigations were needed and those in judicial custody were not needed because they were complete and their further detention did not serve any useful purpose. The accused applicants were admitted on bail in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Saidu Sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.