MUHAMMAD ASIF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 307/325/148/149/109 Pre-arrest Bail The accused admittedly suffered a simple injury to the victim and he Not repeated though as it certainly was. Doing so can lead to a non-controversial conclusion that the accused had no intention of causing the victim the maximum harm. The accused was a student and was under the age of 18 who clearly stated in his application that he was involved in a false and fabricated case. With the sole purpose of making it a target of harassment and humiliation. The question is whether the accused was present on the occasion and in fact attending the commission of the crime was required by the trial court to determine that after recording the evidence, it was alleged that he had received privileges during the period. Was not abused. He remains on Admin Interim Arrest Bail, Interim Pre-arrest Bail is confirmed after the decision in Miran Bakhsh v. State PLD 1989 SC 347.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Chiniot lawyer
