Section 12 suits, pleading for the specific performance of the contract to sell contracts, that the defendants had compromised without knowledge and consent of the defendants. The first appellate court found that although the agreement was modified, it was with the knowledge and consent of the defendants and the order of the plaintiffs was ordered, but no special finding was filed by the first appellate court but its order From the time it was shown that under the impression that the amendment to the contract was made with the consent of the defendants, which had no appellate court, it acted more on speculation rather than on evidence, by the defendants. The comparison of the original contract with the copy presented here clearly proved it. This agreement was stopped after the document was implemented
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
