NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus NISAR AHMAD KHAN
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A \ Labor \ Evidence Complaint Requests to File Lux Standings Whether an employee was a laborer or otherwise, evidence contained by sharp parties on record as a matter of fact Based on this. The employee's position would be inconsistent in that regard, although the employee was alleged to have been an officer grade III and worked as a head cashier at the bank, but the duties of the employees indicated that Its duties were in nature and nothing under the supervision was available to show that the monthly salary of the employees is over Rs 800, based on the evidence of the appellate tribunal record, correctly concluded that the employee was a " The worker was '' and so was Lux Standi for filing complaints.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer