M. SAMIULLAH QURESHI versus DIRECTOR AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, FAISALABAD
Punjab Services Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIIth 1974), Section 7 Appellant's seniority services, on dissolution of their parent department (TDA), with assets and liabilities in the jurisdiction and authority of the Agriculture Department Were kept The Department of Agriculture's agricultural wing absorbed and staff members had to be regarded as new entrants in public service and their seniority was to be counted from the date of enrollment in government service Appellant as the Divisional Accountant at NPS 12. Was shown in a separate seniority. On the visit of the junior superintendent at NPS 15, when the appellant's turn for promotion to the position of senior superintendent at NPS 15, the respondent neglected to promote him and instead replaced the junior superintendent (NPS). 11) was promoted to Senior Superintendent of Respondents. As Administrator Officer also disregarded the Appellant's name for advertising that the current Service Rolls did not provide for the promotion of the Divisional Accountant, the Public Promotion Committee discussed the Income Commission, which decided that the Service The rules should eliminate defects and make appropriate amendments to the rules so that a divisional accountant is also eligible for the post of Administrative Officer / Assistant Accounts Officer. The Department did not find favor with the Treasury, and appellant, in his meeting at the meeting, informed that there was a mistake in the relevant service rolls and that it should be amended so that the divisional accountant qualified for promotion to the post of Administrative Officer / Assistant. Can also be included. The Accounts Officer made this series
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
