Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1975 R6 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 misconduct police officer dismissed, fugitive charged with criminal offense and finally surrendered five years later. , Was dismissed due to a re-hearing of all matters. The prosecution's testimony and the officer's complaint were inexcusable, neither because of his innocence nor because the dismissal of a respected officer was not subject to a verdict in a criminal court, which made him corrupt, fugitive and delusional. Never apologized for the burden. Absent from duty for more than five years, the department's restoration order was declared invalid, incompetent and illegal, based on the judgment of a criminal court police officer, arbitrary, unlawful, illegal. , Ordered the reinstatement of a police officer on the grounds that it was illegal and illegal. Ultra wear and no legal influence was kept aside by the Service Tribunal Police Officer. Thus the order of dismissal was maintained which worked against the police officer even after the deadline was reached, as a result he was dismissed from service and the police officer was not entitled to any benefit of such service. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
