Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YUNIS versus RIFFAT HAYAT

Limiting Act 1908 Section 12 and Article 152 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), filing an appeal in the District Judge's Court of 115 is the time necessary to obtain a copy of the decision and order, the trial court's decision dated 11.5 1987 Date was set. The copy, which was ready for delivery to the copying agency on 12 6 1987 7 6 1987, reported that the order was not ready and that it was not present. Which was prepared to the applicant on 249 1987, a copy of the decree was first requested on 6 10 1987 on 24 for 1987, a copy of the decree was ready for delivery on 29 198 1987 and on the same day. Was obtained by the applicant whose appeal was contested on 18 11 1987, the decision contained in the legal period fixed for appeal in the District Judge's Court under Appeal Article 152, Limitation Act, 1908, and Proper calculation of costs must be deleted for ages to get a copy of Ruman. This will indicate that the appeal came when the District Judge erroneously appealed that the restriction on sanctions be imposed, denying the applicant their benefit in obtaining a copy of Section 12 (3) decisions. Cannot be construed, the time limit for obtaining a copy of the concept of delimitation act will also be removed from time to time. Applicant was wrongly barred from the appeal and therefore allowed review and trial. Was remanded for good judgment. registration advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer