WALI MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD YAR
Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 XLI, R 23 and Section 100 of the Punjab Preparation Act (I 1931), Section 15, on the basis of their participation in the partnership were dismissed by the trial court and the First Appellate Court. In the second appeal, Abdul Aziz and others in Ahmed and others rejected the SC 711 decision of PLD 1989, in the second appeal, on the basis of non-fulfillment of the requirement for students like the Islam High Court. To have them. The courts have referred the following cases and cases to the trial court, which directed the admission of civil suit under its original numbers and proceeded to determine the suit of the appellant in accordance with law. And was excluded without error. O XLI, Receiving Trial Court Remand for Decision Under R 23, CPC High Court authorizes the appellant to recover the entire amount of court fees paid on the memorandum of appeal to the Collector. Gave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Attock lawyer