OBAIDULLAH versus MESSRS ULBRICHT\'S (PAKISTAN) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Duty resumed Employees stated that the employee was denied entry to the factory premises to perform his duties and terminated his services by verbal order. That the factory premises were never denied entry at any stage, the worker and his services were never terminated but the factory was stolen and the worker wig was suspected of being involved in the theft and Only to avoid inquiries was the worker who was going to commit a theft against him, himself involved in his duty. ????? Given the employer's record support and employer's assurance that his services were not terminated and that he could join duty and face charges against him, the employer was allowed to Resume its duties subject to payment, if any, in addition, retaining the service will depend on the outcome of the inquiry which may be against the employer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
