SANAULLAH CHEEMA versus STATE
Article 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), when the magistrate disclosed his identity, the accused threw the currency notes to the ground not to occupy the currency notes of the dispute. Recovery is suspected to be due. The accused were taken from the ground and anyone can throw it and place them on the accused and no one has heard the conversation that took place between the accused and the complainant and the decision of the High Court was not in accordance with any law. ? SC dismisses SCMR 3 petition in Ahmed Bakhsh v. State of 1980 case
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kumbh lawyer
