Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORIES


Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The previous Benefits Tribunal accepted the appeal on technical grounds and allowed the department to take up a new inquiry for independent inquiry by restoring the applicant to the job. Given that the service tribunal could not. Under the rules laid down, the applicant has been restored, denying the entirety of his compensation, saying that the reference to the rule was related to a final order when a government employee was reinstated at the end of an inquiry and the decision was rejected. Was set aside but the charges were not dismissed The tribunal could have restrained from controlling compensation to deal with the matter while ultimately deciding to deal with the charges that the compensation rule had To what extent or not

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Taunsa sharif lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.