MUBARAK BIBI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SARGODHA
Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI Generally O VI, R 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) amending the trial court's order to amend the plaintiff's case was set aside and the plaintiff's case was also The edit was excluded from the jurisdiction In the constitutional jurisdiction, the District Judge High Court declared the dismissal of the case without litigation by the reviewing court, but because of this, the plaintiff's trial was upheld, rejecting the plaintiff's modification order as The trial was originally presented to the trial court for trial. Both parties submitted leave of appeal was granted for scrutiny, even if it was not a valid case for permission to amend the plaintiff. If so, whether the trial court's order directing the amendment was illegal or illegal, without legal authority. Whether the reviewing court could have dismissed the case or given a proper order for remand. And all other related questions. In addition, those raised in the petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
