Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ITTEFAQ FOUNDRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS


Prior to the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4, the Appellate Services Tribunal Civil Servant felt that the order was invalid, a decision was not taken on the appeal filed by the Government. The Government employee was interested in his Department of Appeal. Lost because it was inactive. For more than four years, the matter has been appealed to the appellate authority on the request of the public servant to try to reopen the closed chapter of his case to deal with the appeal of his department so as to file an appeal before the service tribunal. The latest cause of The appellate authority's response to his letter was not an original order. An appeal against such a letter would not be authorized before the service tribunal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.