Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

WAHEED ULLAH KHAN versus MUHAMMAD HANIF


Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Landlord and Tenant, In the writ petition earlier, the High Court observed that the Rent Controller was correct in the view that the defendants were underground transfer facts and circumstances in this case. I should not have taken the Controller and / or the High Court in a previous writ petition with the High Court decision, as there is a definite impact on the title, its related, landlord and tenant relationship. And that whatever results in the legacy of the rental action. It should have been open to the general jurisdiction of the court so that the title could decide the primary fax question so that the petition could be turned into an appeal to examine the question.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.