KANEEZ FATIMA versus KHALIL AHMAD SHAR
Section 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), dismissing the tenants' dispute before the lower courts, shows whether the tenant was the owner of the land under the building, while the superstructure belonged to the landlord. , While it is found that the applicant has been added as a tenant. As a tenant by law, there was no satisfactory ground offered by the tenant to provoke the High Court's finding, to pay rent for the superstructure of the building, the tenant's alternative prayer As such, the Supreme Court considered that by filing a lawsuit in the tenant, the tenant is not entitled to re-occupy the land in violation of the controller's orders, however, regarding the land acquired under the aforesaid building. It is appropriate to ask for a title. Which was affirmed by the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jauharabad lawyer