CABAL BEGUM versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The applicant landlord filed two cases, one for the collection of rent from the respondents and the other for the Board of Revenue, which has been amended. The remand of the case for rent collection on fine working respondents found that the amount of rent and withdrawals from the respondents could not be accepted as a default dispute in the situation, The Board of Revenue had no amendment jurisdiction and secondly, the two orders passed in the two amendments to the Board of Revenue are contradictory. In this case, the first dispute was raised against the applicant through the Supreme Court decision in Section M Nassim against Lucas alias Lucy and others. Member (Revenue); Board of Revenue, Punjab, Lahore and another PLD 1984 SC 227 and another dispute were properly dealt with by the High Court, no weakness, legal or otherwise, in the order of the High Court. After being found, the appeal was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Village Sunder lawyer
