ALLAH DITTA versus GHULAM FATIMA
Article 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The facts of the gift denied by the facts of the gift and subsequently by the DD itself, the effect was the challenged gift of the plaintiff claiming that he had made the DD defendant. What was in favor of the challenge and the result. Further misconduct by Deede with the petitioner was ordered, and the appeals of the Alien applicant in his written statement failed to reach the High Court Donnie after the admission of the gift, such admission was resigned. The statement of such interest later, however, was of secondary importance to the alleged donor, the plaintiff, and was acknowledged by all the courts below it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Bunner lawyer