Article 332/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 1 (185 ()) of the Sessions Court upholding the conviction of the perpetrators and finding evidence not guilty by the High Court to the Supreme Court. Sentences such as those presented in the investigation were not meant to justify interference. Suffering from any weakness, any law or principle, the question of law raised by the accused was also found on fact check. The fact is that the testimony of the official witness shows that he may have obtained a concession in favor of the accused, when under encroachment. Investigation, however, did not provide much benefit to the accused because of the fact that at the time of the incident, such witnesses and complainants were in charge of performing the duties as public servants were accused of doing so. The case will still cover 33 332. , The defendant's panel code-board alleged that the accused did not directly suffer the complainant and thus the provisions of Section 34 of the Code of Conduct were not observed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
