MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus ZAITOON BIBI
Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was taken by the defendant on the acceptance of the applicant's offer, that the defendant took a minor child in his hands and the sacred and these acids applied to the applicant. The statement sought to represent the truth about the dispute between the two parties is that the respondents were not required to utter or imply any word that could cause the child in his lap. The interests of, or the rights of, were adversely affected and the nature of the oath. Violations of justice and decency, respondents' statements were properly decided on the case, if it was considered as general evidence or as a matter of compromise / settlement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Garh More lawyer