Article 3 (witnesses) A criminal trial application for leave to examine witnesses The direct complaint began against the accused, the complainant examined the testimony of the prosecutor and then the accused had the right to cross-examine but The complainant requested to call the prosecutor's witness again on the basis that he was due to be cross examined in connection with a document, the prosecutor's testimony was the complainant's own testimony and if he If he wants to be examined, he should have opposed it when he first presented his evidence to the court and Permission to cross it should be sought. Upon inspection, the complainant did not have an open mind to seek that the witness be summoned to examine it later and say that the witness's reconciliation test. The complainant's complaint was filed with the view that the complainant's request for an inquiry was stopped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
