IRSHAD AHMAD versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
After admitting the witnesses who corroborated the testimony of Section 2 302/3434, they said that the High Court, for reasons of denial, said that the witness was not appropriate. The names of the two suspects were that they had made a pistol from their 12 bore country while they were sitting and were reading the newspaper in the dispensary, medical evidence was testified, according to the prosecution. Evidence of the crime was also presented, the first information reported was very prompt. Half an hour after the prosecution incident, the trial proved beyond any doubt, the High Court ruled that the accused was acquitted. And the Sessions Judge sentenced him to reinstatement by the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Issa Khel lawyer