Section 497 (2) Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 9 (c) and 21 Rule of Government Analysts Controlling Drugs, 2001, R4 (2) Drugs Seizure and Trafficking Further investigations were registered under the direction of the FIR grant police chiefs, but no competent officer, as provided under section 21 of the Drug Substance Control Act 1997, was found under rape. No samples were taken and they were dispatched. The laboratory received feedback within 72 hours, but was reportedly sent seven days after rehabilitation. And no explanation was given by the police for the delay which was in violation of the R4 (2) control of narcotic substances. Government analyst rules 2001, the arrest and recovery memo were prepared in the presence of two witnesses, who were the names of both police officers in the statement made under Section 154, CRPC and raised reasonable doubt about the recovery. Recovery witnesses were not mentioned in the FIR referred to by the prosecution. And the integrity of the rehabilitation counselor had turned into a fish, and it had prosecuted further investigations when there was no reason to put the suspects behind bars, when there were several illegal and irregularities in the prosecution case, Which led to doubt in the prosecution's story. The benefit of which will go to the accused, in the circumstances, was entitled to bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
