Find a Lawyer

NAWAZ versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Appreciating the Evidence The accused were accused of injuring the accused and the prosecution witnesses were injured, no hostility was found between the accused and the prosecution witnesses, there were three witnesses in the case. And one of them was injured. In this case, the prosecution had an important witness because the parties were in contact with each other, there was no false identity, there was the usual light incident and the FIR molecular account immediately entered into the medical evidence. Was also fully confirmed. Meadow's legal report and post-mortem inspection also coincided with the time of the incident. The reason was that the complaining party would release the culprit and include the accused persons, the prosecution had proven their case against the accused persons to be a crime of any kind. The accused were retained with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC ask a advocate free from Vehari lawyer