Sections 497 (2) and 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 interim bail, before the second bail plea, one was withdrawn by the officer presenting the accused in court, presenting that both The suspects have been found. They were not required by the police lawyer. For the accused, the police council said that the statement of the law officer was withdrawn, the request for bail was withdrawn and the same day, the complainant presented two witnesses before the investigating officer. Who said that the accused also kicked the kick. The victim, but the FIR did not mention the fact that according to the FIR, there were no eyewitnesses to the incident and no useful motive could be served by canceling the bail of the accused, since bail after arrest. If the accused is allowed, then they can be guaranteed even before the arrest. The complainant tried to get the accused to appear before the accused with good intentions. The two witnesses have already granted interim bail to the accused. Had done, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
