Find a Lawyer

SHAFQAT NAWAZ versus STATE

The testimonies of Section 302 (b) and 100 of the evidence were contradictory to the contradictions in the eyewitness statements that were completely suppressed by the suspect's injury at the time of the incident. Also proved the wounds of the story. Going to the village of the accused with the victim was neither reliable nor trustworthy, which was prepared to establish his presence on the occasion, medical evidence contradicted oral testimony and the arrest of the accused. And confirmed the statement of the investigating officer of the theft recovery as stated by the investigating officer that the prosecution version was rejected for being inadmissible because the delay in filing of the FIR was deliberate under Section 342. On the other hand, due to the defense request taken by the accused in his statement, the PCP on the other hand not only supported medical treatment. D, but was also accused by Neutral and Natural Defense witnesses of justifying the defendant's use of the right to private defense on his body by using a knife on his person. And Section 100, the PPC, was fully attracted to the matter, but even then the element of provocation could not be ruled out. His wife acquitted the accused in a compromise with the deceased in his own home criminal advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer