Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus STATE

Section 540 Police Order (22 of 2002), Article 18 (6), seeking the retired section P as a judicial witness, the interrogation of the petitioner / accused was suspended by the trial court order under which the retired section P Was summoned as a court witness, saying Section P did not conduct its own investigation. Matter; Neither the statement of any person was recorded during the investigation nor any evidence was collected at the time the investigator was approaching it, the investigator was not given the responsibility that Article 18 (6) of the police order ) On the recommendation of the section PK board constituted under section 3, to be referred to section P. , 2002, but he was instructed only by the DIG (Investigation) to oversee the investigation of the case that the trial superintendent had summoned by the trial court on the complaint of the complainant because during the investigation, Section P ordered a police order. The applicants were convicted under Article 18 (6) of the Act. 2002, the order of inquiry into the matter can be transferred only by adopting the procedure in which it was stated that Article DIG had no jurisdiction to pass any order of change in the investigation of the matter. The general police may order a change investigation on the recommendation of the investigating head in the area. Section PK Board, constituted under Police Order, 2002, in the present case, DIG, illegal party at the request of the camp, without any legal route, was assigned an investigation according to section P. Without any legal force in the Police Order 2002, its powers were illegal, so the investigation by Section P was also illegal, investigating Section P as a court witness. famous high court advocate from Bisham lawyer