Find a Lawyer

RAI ZAID AHMAD KHARAL versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THROUGH CHAIRMAN WAPDA

RR 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (v), & Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The employee who terminated on the basis of corruption was terminated on the basis of corruption, Which was made into an article. In the case of employees, the inquiry was initiated, however, the simplest way of getting rid of the employee without terminating the inquiry and providing him with a fair opportunity was adopted and an unlawful order was approved if a formal inquiry was conducted against anybody. Employee when initiated, but during the inquiry, did not justify the brief procedure of showcase notice without resorting to a small method of showcase notice to the formal inquiry process to its logical end. The inquiry was ordered earlier and the inquiry ended in disapproval The order to be approved without allowing the inquiry process was not given to the employee the appropriate opportunity to restrain himself; and secondly, the dismissal order which was approved in a hurry caused a scandal with the employees. Happened, that couldn't stop the field. The unidentified order was placed in violation of the prescribed law, the employee was reinstated with all the benefits. us immigration advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer