Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) of testimony is of benefit to the suspect, the eye witnesses are closely related to the victim and the witnesses of the occasion do not deserve safe dependence The evidence on the record suggested that the eyewitnesses were not present at the incident and the incident. After they were brought there. On this occasion the lantern was shown as a source of light that was not occupied by the investigating officer and in the dark of night, the attacker on the spot was not possible to identify. The court brought it to the medical evidence, which violated the ocular evidence presented by the prosecution, did not prove that the accused was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted of the circumstances. Was done. power of attorney advocate Jaja Abasian lawyer