NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL
Article 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The specific performance of the plaintiff's contract of sale is based on such agreement, the ruling appellate court dismissing the plaintiffs' case, rejecting the trial court's decision and petitioner's view. Secondary request dismissed. The execution of the contract of sale was firm and the defendants were bound by the aforesaid agreement. In light of the record, such aspect of the case was thoroughly examined not only by the Appellate Court but also by the High Court's M review. Found that the claimant was unsuccessful. The appellate court, in turn, proved that the defendant's foreclosed interest had ever agreed to sell the disputed property to the plaintiff or that he had ever received the sale price or executed the said agreement. And the High Court arrived after the investigation. Not only the appellate court's entire evidence on record, but also the search of the facts recorded by the petitioner against them by the superior company
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Astore lawyer