SHAHZADA versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Land acquisition agreement with applicant upon receipt of proportional amount. Respondents had time to sell the batch of land - time to register the deadline and confirm the change in sale, but till then the sale was incomplete. The date applicant sent a notice to the respondent that since the important date for the sale process registration, etc. has expired, the respondents had stopped the trial of any suitable respondents which was dismissed by the trial court while the first appellate court. In the second appeal, the High Court had dismissed the dismissal order. However, the respondents were ordered to maintain the decision that the two courts below had final conclusions of fact that the sale agreement was nullified because the defendants did not pay their share of the contract, and That is not justified by the superior. Court to disprove the consequences with the departure of the facts
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Shamsabad lawyer