Section 22 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of doubt is that the investigating officer did not appear in the trial court despite repeated deferments and the prosecution case was eventually closed, in which case the non-appearance of the investigating officer gave the accused the valuable right to bring it. To record the error of the prosecution's case and, therefore, relying on the statements of other prosecution witnesses would be unfair. And 340 (2), CR PCs and other defense evidence showed that the accused himself was the victim of another person's misdeeds and that he was deprived of a large sum of money on the pretext of being sent abroad for employment. Was given the benefit of the doubt and was acquitted under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
