Find a Lawyer

MST. NAGINA versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition filed for restoration of marital disputes and marital rights by the plaintiff's wife denying her marital rights against the defendant who denied her marital relationship with her Sued and claimed that her marriage was the result of coercion during her abduction. And that she never agreed to the marriage, the plaintiff also claimed that on the other hand she was the married wife of the plaintiff / husband of another person and on the other hand the case was filed for the restoration of marital rights. Both suits were stable and both the Family Court and the Appellate Court heard the dismissal case simultaneously. In order to justify the decision to remarry on marital relations and marital rights, the plaintiff's plaintiff presented evidence of her marriage through the Record Secretary Union Council, the plaintiff's grandfather, who was awakened, awakened by the consent of the woman, and married. Witnesses to the registrar of They dismissed all that the parties' marriage was serious in their presence and that the plaintiff had voluntarily agreed to the marriage, on the evidence neither the plaintiff's alleged abduction nor the marriage at the time of marriage. Denial / denial shows that the plaintiff ever married someone other than the defendant as her plaintiff's husband claimed that the plaintiff survived, became pregnant and was married to her. The two-month-old baby was being taken down from her womb, in fact it was found out that the plaintiff's case, as stated in her case, was fake and A false story was made about his father's provocation. The courts rightly immigration advocates from Samma Satta lawyer