Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI ALIAS LAKKI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 22 bail, grant of further investigation, although designated in the FIR with specific role for indigenous alcohol consumption in its mansion But the police, during the raid on the accused's mansion, did not take into account legal proceedings which were a pre-requisite of law before the raiding proceedings provided that the law provided for the yeast process So all such articles were recovered, but not recovered. The material used in the fermentation process of alcohol was not sufficient to recover the articles used in the manufacture of alcohol, only to be involved with the commission of this criminal mansion where the accused is allegedly involved in alcohol. Located in the heart. The village and the people were also there, the raiding party had to seek a search warrant from the magistrate or the prohibited officer before the raid proceeded. Already a Prohibited Order (Enforcement) Order, 1979 and Section 105 was required under CR PC 22, but in this case it was not specified which was specified by the police for compliance with the law. , was not. By law, the mansion was located in a residential area where the inmates were kept and considered to be a place of residence, but the police conducted illegal raiding at the scene without taking into account the legal norms. The house was highly appreciated by Islam and it gave great importance to the sanctity of the house. The raiding party also violated the provisions of section 103, CR PC for not sharing the independent witnesses of the area in the recovery process. Was involved, although he was involved jobs for fresh advocates from Hangu lawyer