Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE WITH THE POWERS OF JUDGE FAMILY COURT, FAISALABAD

Sections 2 (c), 5 and 11 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 restitution of restitution allowance granted to the husband by the Family Court on the decree approved for restoration Was arrested in the import. The allowance and she was sent to civil jail, which was released on under-tax payment by installments After being released from civil jail, the husband requested the family court to postpone the recovery for some time, which She will pay when she is made. Payment but permission to execute the application was denied that the petition submitted by the husband was that he could not be arrested for default in the execution of the order as the provisions of the West Pakistan Relief of Inadequacy Ordinance, 1960. Protection under them. With regard to sections 5 and 11 of the West Pakistan Relief of Obedience Ordinance, 1960, the husband considered that the husband was "indebted" to this ordinance under section 2, when such a view was neither constructive nor debatable. It was based on admitted facts was The status of the husband as debtor is dependent on the determination of the question of fact, such enforcement was not taken up before the court, if this court will take up matters according to law. Could and could decide, such a fact could not be investigated in the constitutional petition process. High Court refuses to interfere with order passed by court, constitutional application dismissed in circumstances \ r \ n criminal advocate from Washuk lawyer