Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN ALIAS KHAWAR versus STATE

Sections 2302 (b) and 2 452 // 1099 ??? Appreciating the evidence The most horrific and traumatic crime of the day's murder occurred at 9:30 am and the matter was reported to the police within two hours and two of them. There was no chance of wrongly attributing the townspeople's role. The accused accused had a strong motive for killing the victim. Although the prosecution's prescription is not present and the weakness of the motive cannot provide an opportunity to acquit the accused, otherwise the acting complainant is a prisoner in the premises where the incident occurred, was a natural witness, and the accused And there was no enmity with the other persons, the prosecution witnesses were not hostile to the false allegations, one of the prosecution's witnesses was quite an independent witness, all three of the prosecution's witnesses were successfully extended and searched. The test, which stood in the test, did not draw any significant concessions in favor of Albia's accused Pulia. The defense said that the defense witness was not verbal in nature and did not control the water supported by any other source. The evidence was useless and cannot be relied on. The defense evidence did not advance the accused's case. Recovery of blood-stained theft was another cohort of molecular evidence. The blood stained knife retrieval was proven by the evidence of the witnesses, including the report of the chemical officer of the police officer being a positive prosecutor, in the circumstances, despite the fact that the suspicion of any suspicion was proven after proving his case against the accused. He did not deserve to be bad, no relief for the accused property advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer