Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE

The culprit was convicted on the charge of repeating a fire under Section 302 (c) definition of evidence, death sentence, principles of defense and was sentenced to death by the trial court on the charge of committing murder. It was raised that he had exercised his right to self-defense. The accused confessed that the injured prosecution suffered injury at the hands of a witness who was the result of a single shot wandering pallet that struck the deceased, but the location of the firearm injury by both of them revealed that his injury was independent. The fire resulted in two. Empty cartridges were recovered from the scene of the incident, which took the gun out of the suspect's possession, facts suggest that the defendant repeatedly fired and used his jurisdiction to appeal to the High Court of Defense. Exceeded but the sentence was retained. Fifteen years imprisonment was allowed to appeal the death sentence best law firm from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer