MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus MST. RUKHSANA NAHEED
Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional application suit for the care allowance claimant, who was married to the defendant about 2/2 years ago, has been a defendant for only one year. Ali lived in the house and after that she was staying. For the last 1 1/2 years in his parents' house, but the plaintiff filed a lawsuit with his parents for the recovery of allowance from the date of living at a monthly rate of Rs 3,000 in which the plaintiff paid the restitution allowance. Did not The court allowed the maintenance allowance of the plaintiff against the judgment of the trial at a monthly rate of only Rs 2,000 for the duration of the appeal filed by the appellant, the appellate court allowed below and the plaintiff's restitution allowance. Was given from the day she was living with her parents. On the correctness, the appellate court decided the appeal after examining all the material available on the record, which was appropriate and appropriate in the absence of any illegal interference or infirmi, in this baseless decision, the defendant had to pay Due to earning Rs 30,000 a month, it could not be maintained, the maintenance allowance at a monthly rate of Rs 2,000 was reasonable and was not excessive.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Leepa lawyer